|
Two numbers from Yardi Matrix's September report belong side by side. National asking rents are up 0.7% year over year, to $1,775. Renewal rent growth is 1.7%, which Yardi says is the lowest since before 2020. The spread between those two numbers used to be your value-add. It is almost gone. The market conversation is about whether new-lease rents have bottomed, and there is a case that they have. Yardi says the third quarter posted a 0.3% gain, the first third-quarter increase in four years, and rents are up 1.4% year to date. But the bottoming debate is the wrong question for anyone holding a multifamily asset bought or refinanced between 2021 and 2023. The more important fact is that renewals and asking rents have nearly converged, and that convergence changes where revenue growth comes from. The free NOI growth has been harvestedWhen market rents run well ahead of in-place rents, the rent roll carries an embedded asset. Loss-to-lease is NOI you have not collected yet but can reasonably expect to capture at renewal. In 2021 and 2022 that gap was wide, renewals ran far above long-run averages, and plenty of acquisition models treated the mark-to-market as a reliable source of growth for several years. Renewals still run a point (1.7% vs. 0.7%) above asking rents, but that is now a function of tenant inertia and moving costs, not of a large discount between in-place and market rent. In metros where asking rents are falling, the sign may have already flipped. Austin asking rents are down 2.5% year over year with completions at 4.3% of stock. Charlotte is down 1.3% with completions at 5.2% of stock. In those markets a tenant who signed at the peak may be paying above what the building down the street is advertising. That is gain-to-lease, and it is a liability. It shows up as renewal pushback, lower retention and higher turnover cost, not as revenue. Inflation is now running ahead of rentThe convergence would matter less if costs weren't also moving, but they are. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported on October 14 that headline CPI rose 3.7% over the twelve months ending September, driven largely by energy, with gasoline up 34.2%. Core CPI rose 2.6%. In real terms, asking rents are down about 3% against headline inflation and renewals are down about 2%. Even against core, renewals are losing nearly a point. For an owner, the problem shows up in expenses. Payroll, repairs, utilities and insurance do not track a 1.7% renewal number. Take a hypothetical asset with a 45% expense ratio. If revenue grows 1.7% and expenses grow 3.7%, NOI growth is roughly zero, well under 0.1%. Put the same asset in a model with a 3% revenue escalator and the same expense growth, and NOI grows about 2.4% a year. Over a five-year hold at a constant exit cap rate, that difference is worth roughly 11% of exit value. If you're a sponsor, your promote just went up in smoke. One more signal from the CPI data: The BLS index for rent of primary residence is up 2.8% over the year, still well above Yardi's 0.7% asking growth. CPI rent measures what all tenants pay, so it lags market rents. My reading is that the official rent measure still has room to decelerate, which is consistent with in-place rents continuing to converge toward market rather than pulling away from it. The concession burn-off is a step, not a rateThe bull case for 2027 leans on supply. Deliveries are slowing, lease-up properties are filling, and concessions should burn off. Yardi's new total occupancy measure, which includes properties still in lease-up, supports the first part of that story. Total occupancy was 93.9% in August against stabilized occupancy of 94.3%. The gap between them is 0.4 percentage points, down from a peak of 0.9 points in the second quarter of 2025. Total occupancy is up 50 basis points since January. That compression means the national lease-up wave is mostly absorbed. It also means the benefit of concessions burning off is close to fully realized nationally. Effective rent gets a one-time lift when free months disappear, and then growth reverts to whatever underlying demand supports. A one-time step should not be modeled as a growth rate. Of course, location matters. Charlotte's stabilized occupancy is 93.6% against total occupancy of 92.4%, a 1.2-point gap, three times the national figure. Austin's gap is 0.8 points. In those markets lease-up is still competing for the same tenants your stabilized asset is trying to renew, and concessions will persist longer than a national model would suggest. What I would change in the modelStop modeling renewal growth as a flat escalator. Model it as a function of each unit's in-place rent relative to market. A unit 5% below market can carry a meaningful renewal increase and still retain the tenant. A unit at market should be modeled near market rent growth plus a modest retention premium. A unit above market should be modeled with a renewal increase near zero or negative, a lower retention rate and the turnover cost that comes with it. Then run expenses at a rate tied to actual inflation, not to revenue growth. If your revenue line grows at 1.7% and your expense line grows at 3% or more, accept that 2027 NOI is flat and price the deal accordingly. Furthermore, unless something drastic happens, the 10-year Treasury is not going to rescue the exit cap rate. The upshot is that 2027 revenue growth in most markets will come from occupancy and retention economics, not pricing power. Assets that keep tenants and control turnover cost will outperform assets that are counting on a rent escalator the market is no longer supplying. A model that still carries a 3% renewal assumption is mispricing the asset. So here is the question for your own portfolio. What is your rent roll's loss-to-lease today, unit by unit, and how much of it is actually gain-to-lease? Sources: In other news, I'm still offering on-demand financial modeling courses that are tailored to the commercial real estate industry. Interested? Check out my "Everything" package; I've distilled years of financial modeling experience into easy-to-follow videos with supporting spreadsheets. Like what you're reading? Want to share the love? Pass it on. You can sign up or read archived issues here: https://newsletter.kahrrealestate.com/ |
Every two weeks, I publish a newsletter on commercial real estate topics such as financial modeling, asset management, and portfolio management. Subscribe to my newsletter.
Trepp's September numbers came out last week, and multifamily crossed a line it has not crossed since Covid. The multifamily CMBS delinquency rate hit 8.04 percent, above the overall CMBS rate of 8.02 percent, up 471 basis points in two years. Rents, meanwhile, are up 1.5 percent year over year according to Apartments.com. The apartment market is finally being priced, and the prices are not coming from appraisals. They are coming through the back door: workouts, retrades and liquidations. The...
On September 4, 2026, Mandel Group agreed to merge 13 owned and operated multifamily properties, valued at $614 million, into Cottonwood Communities, a non-traded net asset value (NAV) real estate investment trust (REIT), in exchange for units in Cottonwood's operating partnership (OP) and cash. Most coverage will file this under portfolio consolidation, a REIT buying scale and a fee stream from a private operator ready to monetize. I think there's more going on here. Both firms are also...
Good schools do not grow NOI, and the reason is a basis problem. Columbia Business School's Milstein Center published a study on August 3, 2026, by Michael Steinberg of MetLife Investment Management and Christopher Munsell of Columbia, that has been circulating through commercial real estate newsletters since mid-August. They tested one of the most durable assumptions in multifamily investing, that a property assigned to better schools should produce better net operating income (NOI) growth....